Popular Colorado River Canyon Could Get Protection, But One Man Stands in the Way

Popular Colorado River Canyon Could Get Protection, But One Man Stands in the Way

Share on Facebook Share on Twitter The struggle to protect Browns Canyon, a rugged stretch of the Arkansas River in central


adventure journal browns canyon
  • Share on Facebook
  • Share on Twitter

The struggle to protect Browns Canyon, a rugged stretch of the Arkansas River in central Colorado, has been waxing and waning since the area was first studied for wilderness designation in the 1970s. Several attempts to create a new federal wilderness have been floated since then, and though they’ve come tantalizingly close, none have yet passed.

Senator Mark Udall, D-Colorado, wants to change that. A former Outward Bound director, wilderness proponent, and mountaineer (he’s climbed Denali, Aconcagua and 26,000 feet of Everest), Udall announced last week the culmination of a project he’s been working on for 18 months: a bill to create a brand new, 22,000-acre national monument in Browns Canyon, including 10,500 acres of wilderness. After soliciting thousands of comments and holding several public meetings, Udall seems to have found a recipe for success – the support of local businesses, national monument designation (which offers more flexible management than pure wilderness), and unchanged access for hunters, ranchers, off-roaders, and human-powered recreation such as rafting.

“There’s tremendous support on the ground,” says Matt Keller, the national monument campaign director for advocacy group The Wilderness Society. “Senator Udall and his staff have done a tremendous job listening to people’s concerns and addressing them.”

But noticeably absent from the discussion has been Rep. Doug Lamborn, the Republican who represents Chaffee County, where the canyon is. Though he has yet to make an official statement, Lamborn’s spokesman said that the congressman does not support Udall’s bill and still has “concerns over the lack of consensus…from certain residents.”

Lamborn’s disapproval presents a fairly significant hurdle, because while most national monuments are created by presidential decree under the Antiquities Act, Udall wants to take a different route: Congressional approval, for which he’ll likely need Lamborn’s support. Without it, the bill – which proponents have heralded as a groundbreaking step in the 40-year battle to protect Browns Canyon from drilling and development – may suffer the same fate as past attempts, like a 2006 push for wilderness designation that once seemed destined for success.

That bill, written by Republican Senator Wayne Allard and Rep. Joel Hefley, was co-sponsored by every member of the Colorado delegation. Passage seemed imminent until, in the eleventh hour, the National Rifle Association got involved. Amid concerns that limitations on road building would prevent some hunters from hauling out big game, progress ground to a halt. Or as longtime contributor Ed Quillen wrote in High Country News shortly before his death last year: “Even though big-game hunting would still be permitted, wilderness would infringe on the Second Amendment rights of geriatric ATV-driver hunters who were too cheap to rent pack horses and mules.”

Udall hopes that compromises in his legislation – such as protecting existing uses and adjusting the boundary to exclude cattle watering tanks – are enough to garner a wide net of supporters, including skeptics like Lamborn. Proponents of the designation cite the financial boon of national monuments (though as the most popular whitewater rafting destination in the U.S., Browns hardly needs additional promotion), the relatively inexpensive cost of adding new protections to existing federal land, and the need to protect what former Interior Secretary Ken Salazar called a place that’s “quintessential Colorado.” The area would also be one of the few low-elevation regions protected in the state, offering prime winter wildlife habitat.

If Udall succeeds, Browns Canyon could become the first piece of wilderness protected by either this or the previous Congress – the first congresses since the 1960s to not protect a single acre of wilderness. Udall spokesman Mike Saccone says the senator is now focusing on building congressional support and is working directly with Lamborn’s office: “We’re hopeful when he sees the community support he’ll come around.”


In affiliation with High Country News. Photo by Susan Mayfield2012/Flickr


Environmental coverage made possible in part by support from Patagonia. For information on Patagonia and its environmental efforts, visit www.patagonia.com.


aj logo 35
  • Share on Facebook
  • Share on Twitter

Showing 4 comments
  • Matthew Skinner
    Matthew Skinner
    Reply

    Someone is getting their pockets lined!

  • Michael Todd
    Michael Todd
    Reply

    Solution for all you chubby hunters who have a problem with no more road developement in this beauty of a place. I know fewer roads would limit your ability to haul out kill…. but my buddy Todd Andres give him a call he will haul it out for ya :)

  • David Jaget
    David Jaget
    Reply

    If a Democrat is behind the bill….. it’s bad.

  • Grit and Thistle Film Co.
    Reply

    Here is a short film we made about the Browns Canyon area – for all of you that haven’t had a chance to visit yet. Cheers. https://vimeo.com/58055595

Leave a Comment

GO DEEPER

GEAR
HISTORICAL BADASS
OVERLANDIA
DAILY BIKE
WALLPAPERS
WEEKEND CABIN
adventure journal video of the day ultramontaneOLYMPUS DIGITAL CAMERA